DR. DAMODAR PANDA ETC. versus STATE OF ORISSA ETC.
States and Union Territories must permit officers from originating states to hold enquiries within recipient states for enforcement of the Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act, and no recipient state shall impede such process.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Dr. Damodar Panda; Respondent: State of Orissa; Respondent: A.K. Panda; Respondent: Ms. C.K. Sucharita; Respondent: Ms. A. Subhashini
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 1990
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (civil) / Order Disposing Writ Petitions
- Outcome
- Writ Petitions disposed of
- Legal Topics
- Inter State Migrant Workmen, Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service, Section 20 Enforcement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr. Damodar Panda
Petitioner
State of Orissa
Respondent
A.K. Panda
Respondent
Ms. C.K. Sucharita
Respondent
Ms. A. Subhashini
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) / Order Disposing Writ Petitions
Legal Issues
- 1 How to enforce the provisions of the Inter-State Migrant Workmen (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979, particularly section 20
Ratio Decidendi
States and Union Territories must permit officers from originating states to hold enquiries within recipient states for enforcement of the Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act, and no recipient state shall impede such process.
Court Disposition
Writ Petitions disposed of
Orders
- Every State and Union Territory in India must permit officers of originating States of migrant labour to conduct appropriate enquiries within recipient States for enforcement of the Act.
- No recipient State shall place any embargo or hindrance in such process.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment