STATE OF ORISSA versus DIVISIONAL MANAGER, LIC AND ANR.
Services rendered by the State to its government servants are excluded from the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, as they are provided free of charge and under a contract of personal service; therefore, a government servant cannot claim damages against the State under the Act.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of Orissa; Respondent: Haribandhu Setha; Respondent: Divisional Manager, UC
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court, Appeal From National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Definition of Services Under Consumer Protection Act, Exclusion of Government Servant From Consumer Protection Act, Contract of Personal Service
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of Orissa
Appellant
Haribandhu Setha
Respondent
Divisional Manager, UC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court, Appeal From National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a government servant can claim damages against the State under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
- 2 Whether services rendered by the State to its servant are excluded from the definition of 'services' under the Act
Ratio Decidendi
Services rendered by the State to its government servants are excluded from the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, as they are provided free of charge and under a contract of personal service; therefore, a government servant cannot claim damages against the State under the Act.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- No costs awarded.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment