STATE OF ORISSA versus M.A. TULLOCH AND CO.
The Orissa Act was rendered inoperative by the Central Act of 1957, which covered the entire field of 'regulation of mines and mineral development', and thus deprived the State of legislative competence in the area. However, the replacement of the Orissa Act by the Central Act amounts to a 'repeal', and the saving provision of s. 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, applies. Therefore, liabilities accrued under the Orissa Act prior to June 1, 1958 (the date on which the Central Act came into force) survive and can be recovered despite the supersession of the State law.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of Orissa; Respondent: M.A. Tulloch & Co.; Appellant: Administrator, Orissa Mining Areas Development Fund
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 1963
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order of the Orissa High Court in O.j.c. Nos. 142 and 144 of 1960, With Certificate Under Art. 132(1) of the Constitution
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed. The Writ Petitions of the Respondents before the High Court are dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Repugnancy of Laws, Legislative Competence, Effect of Union Legislation on State Law, Retrospective Operation of Statutes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of Orissa
Appellant
M.A. Tulloch & Co.
Respondent
Administrator, Orissa Mining Areas Development Fund
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order of the Orissa High Court in O.j.c. Nos. 142 and 144 of 1960, With Certificate Under Art. 132(1) of the Constitution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Orissa Mining Areas Development Fund Act, 1952, continued to operate after the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 was brought into force by Parliament
- 2 Whether liabilities accrued under the Orissa Act prior to June 1, 1958 could be recovered subsequent to the Central enactment
- 3 Whether s. 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 (saving accrued liabilities) applied to repeals by implication
Ratio Decidendi
The Orissa Act was rendered inoperative by the Central Act of 1957, which covered the entire field of 'regulation of mines and mineral development', and thus deprived the State of legislative competence in the area. However, the replacement of the Orissa Act by the Central Act amounts to a 'repeal', and the saving provision of s. 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, applies. Therefore, liabilities accrued under the Orissa Act prior to June 1, 1958 (the date on which the Central Act came into force) survive and can be recovered despite the supersession of the State law.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed. The Writ Petitions of the Respondents before the High Court are dismissed.
Orders
- The Writ Petitions filed by the Respondents before the Orissa High Court are dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment