STATE OF ORISSA & ANR. versus RAJKISHORE NANDA & ORS.
Filling up vacancies beyond the notified vacancies is not permissible in law. Inclusion of a candidate's name in a select list does not confer any indefeasible right to appointment. Once the selection process for notified vacancies has ended and the lawful appointments made, no further appointments can be granted from the select list. Courts and tribunals are not competent to direct the State to fill up vacancies or initiate selection processes for future vacancies beyond those properly notified and recruited under statutory rules.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of Orissa; Respondent: Rajkishore Nanda & Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 03 June 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; orders of Tribunal and High Court set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Recruitment, Select List, Appointment, Statutory Rules, Constitutional Mandate
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of Orissa
Appellant
Rajkishore Nanda & Ors.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether candidates in the select list who were not appointed have a right to appointment
- 2 Whether vacancies beyond those notified can be filled from the select list
- 3 Validity and use of select list for future appointments
Ratio Decidendi
Filling up vacancies beyond the notified vacancies is not permissible in law. Inclusion of a candidate's name in a select list does not confer any indefeasible right to appointment. Once the selection process for notified vacancies has ended and the lawful appointments made, no further appointments can be granted from the select list. Courts and tribunals are not competent to direct the State to fill up vacancies or initiate selection processes for future vacancies beyond those properly notified and recruited under statutory rules.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; orders of Tribunal and High Court set aside.
Orders
- Judgment and order of the Tribunal dated 7.4.2000 and the High Court dated 26.10.2005 are set aside.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment