STATE OF PUNJAB versus JAGTAR SINGH AND ORS.
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's finding that the offence was committed due to grave and sudden provocation and thus amounted to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, falling under Section 304 Part-I read with Section 34 IPC, and not murder under Section 302/34 IPC. The evidence of Santa Singh (PW5) was unreliable, and the post-mortem report showing sexual intercourse supported the provocation theory.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of Punjab; Respondents: Jagtar Singh and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Judgment Altering Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Culpable Homicide, Grave and Sudden Provocation, Section 304 Part I IPC, Section 34 IPC, Section 300 IPC, Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of Punjab
Appellant
Jagtar Singh and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Judgment Altering Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction under Section 302/34 IPC was justified or should be altered to Section 304 Part-I read with Section 34 IPC
- 2 Assessment of evidence, including reliability of prosecution witnesses and post-mortem findings
- 3 Quantum of sentence in light of circumstances including grave and sudden provocation
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's finding that the offence was committed due to grave and sudden provocation and thus amounted to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, falling under Section 304 Part-I read with Section 34 IPC, and not murder under Section 302/34 IPC. The evidence of Santa Singh (PW5) was unreliable, and the post-mortem report showing sexual intercourse supported the provocation theory.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Conviction under Section 304 Part-I read with Section 34 IPC and sentence of five years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs. 1,000/- each is upheld; no interference with quantum of sentence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment