STATE OF PUNJAB versus SARDAR SEWA SINGH GILL & ORS.

STATE OF PUNJAB versus SARDAR SEWA SINGH GILL & ORS.

The notice given by the Director of Industries dated August 14, 1952 satisfied the requirements of the fourth proviso to clause 6(a) of the Agreement; the notice period having expired, the State was entitled to possession of the land and any structures or machinery not removed within the notice period would vest in the State.

Parties
Appellant: State of Punjab; Respondent No. 1: Sardar Sewa Singh Gill; Respondent No. 2: Patiala Banaspati and Allied Products Co. Ltd.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
27 October 1969
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment of Punjab High Court (letters Patent Appeals Nos. 230 304 of 1962)
Outcome
Appeal allowed; order of Division Bench modified.
Legal Topics
Land Reversion, Company Winding Up, Notice to Remove Machinery
Property Law Contract Law Company Law Land Reversion Company Winding Up Notice to Remove Machinery

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

State of Punjab

Appellant

Sardar Sewa Singh Gill

Respondent No. 1

Patiala Banaspati and Allied Products Co. Ltd.

Respondent No. 2

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment of Punjab High Court (letters Patent Appeals Nos. 230 304 of 1962)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether valid notice was given under fourth proviso to clause 6(a) of the Agreement for removal of machinery and handing over possession after winding up of the company
  2. 2 Whether land title vested in the State upon winding up as per Agreement

Ratio Decidendi

The notice given by the Director of Industries dated August 14, 1952 satisfied the requirements of the fourth proviso to clause 6(a) of the Agreement; the notice period having expired, the State was entitled to possession of the land and any structures or machinery not removed within the notice period would vest in the State.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; order of Division Bench modified.

Orders

  • Respondents directed to hand over possession of the land in dispute to the State of Punjab within six months from the date of judgment.
  • No order as to costs.