STATE OF PUNJAB versus JAGDIP SINGH & ORS.

STATE OF PUNJAB versus JAGDIP SINGH & ORS.

Since there were no substantive vacancies for confirmation as Tahsildars, the order of confirmation was void; thus, the respondents did not acquire the right to the post, and their reversion to officiating Tahsildars did not amount to reduction in rank attracting Article 311(2). The successor Government was competent to issue the notification in question.

Parties
Appellant: State of Punjab; Respondents: Jagdip Singh & Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
19 September 1963
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (punjab High Court) by Special Leave
Outcome
Appeals allowed (by majority).
Legal Topics
Reduction in Rank, State Reorganisation, Government Service Confirmation, Article 311(2)

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

State of Punjab

Appellant

Jagdip Singh & Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (punjab High Court) by Special Leave

  1. 1 Whether the cancellation of confirmation as Tahsildars amounted to reduction in rank violating Article 311(2) of the Constitution
  2. 2 Whether the action violates section 116 of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956

Ratio Decidendi

Since there were no substantive vacancies for confirmation as Tahsildars, the order of confirmation was void; thus, the respondents did not acquire the right to the post, and their reversion to officiating Tahsildars did not amount to reduction in rank attracting Article 311(2). The successor Government was competent to issue the notification in question.

Court Disposition

Appeals allowed (by majority).

Orders

  • The impugned decision of the High Court is set aside.
  • Costs to be borne as incurred.