M/S JAGATJIT SUGAR MILLS ETC. versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.
The purchase of sugarcane, though exempt on sale by the grower under Section 6 when sold by the grower himself, is nevertheless liable to purchase tax in the hands of the purchasing dealer (the sugar mill) under Section 4(1) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948, since Section 6 does not exempt purchase. Section 4-B does not apply to Schedule-B goods; the charging provision is Section 4(1) itself.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Jagatjit Sugar Mills Co. Ltd.; Respondent: State of Punjab; Respondent: Assessing Authority, Sales Tax, Kapurthala
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 04 October 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (civil) Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Final Judgment on Merits
- Outcome
- Petitions dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Sales Tax, Purchase Tax, Exemption of Agricultural Produce, Interpretation of Tax Statutes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jagatjit Sugar Mills Co. Ltd.
Petitioner
State of Punjab
Respondent
Assessing Authority, Sales Tax, Kapurthala
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Final Judgment on Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the purchase of sugarcane by the petitioner-mill from cane growers and co-operative societies is liable to purchase tax under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948.
- 2 Whether sugarcane, being agricultural produce and exempted from sales tax on sale by the grower under Section 6 read with Schedule-B, is also exempt from purchase tax.
Ratio Decidendi
The purchase of sugarcane, though exempt on sale by the grower under Section 6 when sold by the grower himself, is nevertheless liable to purchase tax in the hands of the purchasing dealer (the sugar mill) under Section 4(1) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948, since Section 6 does not exempt purchase. Section 4-B does not apply to Schedule-B goods; the charging provision is Section 4(1) itself.
Court Disposition
Petitions dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Writ petitions are dismissed with costs quantified at Rs. 10,000 consolidated to the respondent.
- The interim orders in the writ petitions are vacated.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment