HAZARA SINGH GILL versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB
Where the petitioner has, by affidavit, made out sufficient circumstances to reasonably entertain apprehension of not receiving justice, and these allegations are uncontroverted, the interests of justice demand that criminal cases be transferred outside the State.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Hazara Singh Gill; Respondent: State of Punjab
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 10 May 1963
- Procedural Posture
- Transfer Petition Under Section 527 Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 / Original Jurisdiction—petition for Transfer of Criminal Cases
- Outcome
- Petition allowed
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Criminal Cases, Apprehension of Justice, Affidavit Evidence, Duty of Court in Transfer Petitions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hazara Singh Gill
Petitioner
State of Punjab
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Transfer Petition Under Section 527 Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 / Original Jurisdiction—petition for Transfer of Criminal Cases
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether serious uncontroverted allegations by affidavit are sufficient to justify transfer of criminal cases outside the State
- 2 Duty of Court when no affidavit in reply is filed
Ratio Decidendi
Where the petitioner has, by affidavit, made out sufficient circumstances to reasonably entertain apprehension of not receiving justice, and these allegations are uncontroverted, the interests of justice demand that criminal cases be transferred outside the State.
Court Disposition
Petition allowed
Orders
- The two criminal cases (33/3 and 33/4 of 1963) under Section 52 of the Prisons Act are transferred from Magistrate, First Class, Amritsar, Punjab to a competent court in Saharanpur District to be tried by magistrate chosen by District Magistrate, Saharanpur.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment