STATE OF PUNJAB versus KESAR SINGH
The High Court's order directing the respondent's premature release was not legally permissible, as only the government can exercise that power under Section 433 CrPC. The High Court at most could have directed the government to consider premature release, not order it.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of Punjab; Respondent: Kesar Singh
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed, High Court order set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Commutation, Premature Release, Powers Under Cr PC Section 433, High Court's Powers Under Cr PC Section 482
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of Punjab
Appellant
Kesar Singh
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court could direct premature release of a life convict before completing 14 years' sentence under Section 482 CrPC
- 2 Whether the power to commute a sentence under Section 433 CrPC rests exclusively with the government
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court's order directing the respondent's premature release was not legally permissible, as only the government can exercise that power under Section 433 CrPC. The High Court at most could have directed the government to consider premature release, not order it.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed, High Court order set aside.
Orders
- The impugned order of the High Court is set aside.
- The respondent may approach the State Government for commutation and premature release, which shall be decided on merits uninfluenced by previous orders.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment