STATE OF RAJASTHAN versus RAMDEEN & OTHERS
A composite application by the State under section 378 Cr.P.C. for leave to appeal, containing all requisites for a memorandum of appeal, is equivalent to a memorandum of appeal. Such application filed within the limitation period satisfies statutory requirements and should not be dismissed as time-barred by...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of Rajasthan; Respondents: Ramdeen & Others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 04 March 1977
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Rajasthan High Court Judgment Dated 27 1 1975
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Against Acquittal, Limitation for Appeals, Composite Application Under S.378 Cr PC
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of Rajasthan
Appellant
Ramdeen & Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal by Special Leave From Rajasthan High Court Judgment Dated 27 1 1975
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a composite application for leave to appeal and memorandum of appeal is permissible under section 378(1) and (3) Cr.P.C., 1973
- 2 Whether the time-bar applies when leave to appeal is delayed beyond ninety days post acquittal
Ratio Decidendi
A composite application by the State under section 378 Cr.P.C. for leave to appeal, containing all requisites for a memorandum of appeal, is equivalent to a memorandum of appeal. Such application filed within the limitation period satisfies statutory requirements and should not be dismissed as time-barred by insisting upon a subsequent memo of appeal after grant of leave.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of the High Court set aside
- Petition of appeal of June 27, 1974 restored to file and treated as memorandum of appeal under section 378(1) Cr.P.C.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment