BANKATLAL versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN

BANKATLAL versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Large-scale adulteration of foodstuffs is an activity prejudicial to the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the community, justifying preventive detention under s. 3(1)(a)(iii) of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971. The grounds of detention were sufficiently communicated, and failure to...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Petitioner: Bankatlal; Respondent: State of Rajasthan
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
17 October 1974
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Supreme Court of India Judgment on Writ Challenging Preventive Detention
Outcome
Petition dismissed
Legal Topics
Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971, Scope of 'supply and Service' Under Preventive Detention, Requirement of Communication of Detention Grounds, Food Adulteration and Public Health
Constitutional Law Preventive Detention Administrative Law Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 Scope of 'supply and Service' Under Preventive Detention Requirement of Communication of Detention Grounds Food Adulteration and Public Health

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bankatlal

Petitioner

State of Rajasthan

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Supreme Court of India Judgment on Writ Challenging Preventive Detention

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the grounds of detention under s. 3(1)(a)(iii) of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 were non-existent or vague
  2. 2 Whether the grounds communicated to the detenu had a direct nexus with the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the community
  3. 3 Whether there was non-communication of all details of previous prosecutions/convictions and if that contravened Article 22(5) of the Constitution and s. 8(1) of the Act

Ratio Decidendi

Large-scale adulteration of foodstuffs is an activity prejudicial to the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the community, justifying preventive detention under s. 3(1)(a)(iii) of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971. The grounds of detention were sufficiently communicated, and failure to include all prior conviction details did not contravene constitutional or statutory requirements since the substance of the action was known to the detenu.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed

Orders

  • Rule discharged
  • Detention order confirmed