SANT RAM SHARMA versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
Promotion to selection grade posts in the Indian Police Service is to be based primarily on merit, with seniority considered only where merit is otherwise equal; such procedure, supplemented by administrative instructions where rules are silent, does not violate the constitutional guarantees of equality and equal opportunity under Articles 14 and 16, as long as the cases of all eligible candidates are considered.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Sant Ram Sharma; Respondent: State of Rajasthan; Respondent: Union of India; Respondent: Hanuman Sharma; Respondent: Sultan Singh
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 1967
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Promotion Policy, Equality Before Law, Administrative Instructions and Statutory Rules, Seniority Vs. Merit in Public Service Promotions, Fundamental Rights Under Articles 14 and 16
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sant Ram Sharma
Petitioner
State of Rajasthan
Respondent
Union of India
Respondent
Hanuman Sharma
Respondent
Sultan Singh
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioner was entitled to promotion merely on the basis of seniority as reflected in the Gradation List.
- 2 Whether the Government can promote officers to selection grade posts on the basis of merit and not seniority alone.
- 3 Whether absence of specific statutory rules for promotion allows issuance of administrative instructions supplementing existing rules.
Ratio Decidendi
Promotion to selection grade posts in the Indian Police Service is to be based primarily on merit, with seniority considered only where merit is otherwise equal; such procedure, supplemented by administrative instructions where rules are silent, does not violate the constitutional guarantees of equality and equal opportunity under Articles 14 and 16, as long as the cases of all eligible candidates are considered.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed.
Orders
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment