JAWAHARMAL versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS
Section 2 of the Rajasthan Passengers and Goods Taxation (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1964, by retrospectively amending s.3 of the principal Act and obtaining President's assent, validly cures defects arising from earlier lack of assent to amendments, permitting retrospective tax up to March 26, 1962; however, section 4, purporting to validate prior acts by legislative fiat, exceeds legislative jurisdiction and is invalid.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Jawaharmal; Respondent: State of Rajasthan; Respondent: Deputy Commissioner, Excise and Taxation (Appeals), Jaipur; Respondent: Taxation Officer, Rajasthan Motor Vehicles, Sikar
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 22 September 1965
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition / Original Jurisdiction; Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition allowed in part.
- Legal Topics
- Retrospective Taxation, Validation of Statutes, President's Assent Under Article 255, State Legislative Power
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jawaharmal
Petitioner
State of Rajasthan
Respondent
Deputy Commissioner, Excise and Taxation (Appeals), Jaipur
Respondent
Taxation Officer, Rajasthan Motor Vehicles, Sikar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition / Original Jurisdiction; Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Rajasthan Passengers and Goods Taxation (Amendment and Validation) Act 1964 ss. 2 and 4 validly cured defects arising from non-observance of Article 255 of the Constitution.
- 2 Whether retrospective taxation under s.2 is reasonable and constitutional.
- 3 Whether legislature can validate statutes lacking President's assent by legislative fiat.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 2 of the Rajasthan Passengers and Goods Taxation (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1964, by retrospectively amending s.3 of the principal Act and obtaining President's assent, validly cures defects arising from earlier lack of assent to amendments, permitting retrospective tax up to March 26, 1962; however, section 4, purporting to validate prior acts by legislative fiat, exceeds legislative jurisdiction and is invalid.
Court Disposition
Petition allowed in part.
Orders
- Impugned assessment orders set aside for period between 26th March 1962 and 9th September 1964; fresh assessment to be levied at rates of notification dated 30th April 1959 under s.3 of principal Act.
- Assessment orders for other periods upheld; prayer to set them aside rejected.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment