SUKH DEO NARAIN versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN

SUKH DEO NARAIN versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN

A transfer petition which contains neither facts nor the questions of law is improperly drafted and amounts to a failure of the advocate's duty to both court and client. Such petitions are liable to be dismissed.

Parties
Petitioner: Sukh Deo Narain; Respondent: State of Rajasthan
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
20 July 1984
Procedural Posture
Transfer Petition (civil) No. 344 of 1983 / Original Jurisdiction
Outcome
Petition dismissed
Legal Topics
Transfer of Cases, Petition Drafting, Advocate's Duty
Constitutional Law Practice and Procedure Transfer of Cases Petition Drafting Advocate's Duty

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sukh Deo Narain

Petitioner

State of Rajasthan

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Transfer Petition (civil) No. 344 of 1983 / Original Jurisdiction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a petition for transfer which contains no statement of facts or questions of law amounts to proper discharge of duty by the advocate.

Ratio Decidendi

A transfer petition which contains neither facts nor the questions of law is improperly drafted and amounts to a failure of the advocate's duty to both court and client. Such petitions are liable to be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed

Orders

  • Transfer petition is dismissed