VISHAKA AND ORS. versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

VISHAKA AND ORS. versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

The Supreme Court held that sexual harassment of working women results in violation of the fundamental rights to gender equality, life, liberty, and freedom to pursue an occupation guaranteed by Articles 14, 15, 19(1)(g), and 21 of the Constitution. In absence of enacted law addressing this, the Court, invoking its...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Petitioner: Vishaka and Others; Respondent: State of Rajasthan and Others
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
13 August 1997
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (criminal) Under Article 32 / Final Judgment/disposal
Outcome
Writ petitions disposed of; guidelines issued for implementation until legislation is enacted.
Legal Topics
Sexual Harassment at Workplace, Fundamental Rights, Gender Equality, Implementation of International Conventions, Judicial Guidelines
Constitutional Law Labour Law Gender Justice Human Rights Sexual Harassment at Workplace Fundamental Rights Gender Equality Implementation of International Conventions +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vishaka and Others

Petitioner

State of Rajasthan and Others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition (criminal) Under Article 32 / Final Judgment/disposal

  1. 1 Whether sexual harassment at the workplace violates the fundamental rights of working women under the Constitution of India.
  2. 2 Whether, in the absence of specific domestic legislation, the Supreme Court can frame guidelines to prevent sexual harassment at workplaces.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that sexual harassment of working women results in violation of the fundamental rights to gender equality, life, liberty, and freedom to pursue an occupation guaranteed by Articles 14, 15, 19(1)(g), and 21 of the Constitution. In absence of enacted law addressing this, the Court, invoking its powers under Articles 32 and 141 and referring to international conventions such as CEDAW, framed binding guidelines to prevent sexual harassment at workplaces, to be observed until suitable legislation is enacted.

Court Disposition

Writ petitions disposed of; guidelines issued for implementation until legislation is enacted.

Orders

  • The Supreme Court issued binding guidelines for the prevention of sexual harassment at workplaces, to be followed by all employers and authorities until suitable legislation is enacted.
  • Guidelines to include duty of employers to prevent and redress sexual harassment, definition of sexual harassment, mechanisms for complaint and redress, creation of complaints committees (headed by a woman and including a third party), deterrence of victimisation, awareness measures, reporting requirements, and...