STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR. versus DR. ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA & ORS.
The impugned provision of Ordinance 278-E(d)(ii) results in oppressive and offensive inequality by conferring undue advantage to candidates from the same medical college, making merit criteria illusory and violating Article 14 of the Constitution. Accordingly, the provision is unconstitutional and must be quashed.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of Rajasthan; Respondent: Dr. Ashok Kumar Gupta; Respondent: S.K. Jain
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Equality Before Law, Admissions to Professional Colleges, Institutional Preference, Reservation in Education
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of Rajasthan
Appellant
Dr. Ashok Kumar Gupta
Respondent
S.K. Jain
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Ordinance No. 278-E(d)(ii) of University of Rajasthan providing 5% addition to aggregate marks for students passing MBBS from same institution violates Article 14 of the Constitution
Ratio Decidendi
The impugned provision of Ordinance 278-E(d)(ii) results in oppressive and offensive inequality by conferring undue advantage to candidates from the same medical college, making merit criteria illusory and violating Article 14 of the Constitution. Accordingly, the provision is unconstitutional and must be quashed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Ordinance 278-E(d)(ii) of University of Rajasthan declared unconstitutional and quashed.
- Admissions to Post Graduate Degree Courses in all medical colleges in Rajasthan to be made in accordance with the High Court's decision dated August 7, 1987.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment