STATE OF RAJASTHAN versus MANOJ KUMAR
The trial court convicted all accused; High Court accepted right of private defence but found Raju @ Rajkumar exceeded it, thus converted his conviction to Section 304 Part I IPC, and acquitted Hemant and Manoj where Section 34 IPC was not applicable, as constructive liability was not attracted when only one accused exceeded the right of private defence, and there was no common intention to commit murder.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of Rajasthan; Respondent: Manoj Kumar
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment on Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Right of Private Defence, Common Intention, Constructive Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of Rajasthan
Appellant
Manoj Kumar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court was justified in accepting the contention of right of private defence
- 2 Whether Section 34 IPC could be attracted in the factual circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
The trial court convicted all accused; High Court accepted right of private defence but found Raju @ Rajkumar exceeded it, thus converted his conviction to Section 304 Part I IPC, and acquitted Hemant and Manoj where Section 34 IPC was not applicable, as constructive liability was not attracted when only one accused exceeded the right of private defence, and there was no common intention to commit murder.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- Conviction of Rajkumar under Section 304 Part I IPC and Sections 25, 27 Arms Act affirmed
- Hemant Kumar and Manoj Kumar acquitted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment