STATE OF RAJASTHAN versus NANA AND ORS.

STATE OF RAJASTHAN versus NANA AND ORS.

Statement in FIR is relevant only for assessing the statement of the maker; consistent statements of other eye-witnesses about the role played by Bada make his acquittal unjustified. Conviction of Nana was rightly altered to Section 304 Part II IPC, and Sawa was rightly acquitted as no witness spoke to his involvement.

Parties
Appellant: State of Rajasthan; Respondent: Nana; Respondent: Bada; Respondent: Sawa
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
02 August 2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal Against High Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal partly allowed (as regards Bada), and dismissed (as regards Sawa and Nana)
Legal Topics
Murder, Culpable Homicide, Evidence Assessment, Credibility of Witnesses

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

State of Rajasthan

Appellant

Nana

Respondent

Bada

Respondent

Sawa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal Against High Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether acquittal of Bada by High Court was justified
  2. 2 Whether conviction of Nana under Section 302 IPC should be altered to Section 304 Part II IPC
  3. 3 Effect of contradictory statements between FIR and court evidence on credibility of other witnesses

Ratio Decidendi

Statement in FIR is relevant only for assessing the statement of the maker; consistent statements of other eye-witnesses about the role played by Bada make his acquittal unjustified. Conviction of Nana was rightly altered to Section 304 Part II IPC, and Sawa was rightly acquitted as no witness spoke to his involvement.

Court Disposition

Appeal partly allowed (as regards Bada), and dismissed (as regards Sawa and Nana)

Orders

  • Acquittal of Bada by High Court set aside; Bada convicted under Section 304 Part II IPC read with Section 34 IPC and sentenced to seven years imprisonment.
  • Appeals of Sawa and Nana dismissed.