STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR. versus SURENDRA MOHNOT & ORS.

STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR. versus SURENDRA MOHNOT & ORS.

Employees prior to regularization are not members of service or part of the cadre; selection grade entitlement arises only from date of regularization. Any grant based on misconstrued legal position or concession referencing an unrelated precedent does not override correct law. The writ petition claiming selection grade from initial appointment was not justified and must be dismissed.

Parties
Appellant: State of Rajasthan; Respondent: Surendra Mohnot; Respondent: Respondent Nos. 1 to 7 (Lower Division Clerks, ad hoc appointees)
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
30 June 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Orders, Final Supreme Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed; writ petition dismissed; prior orders set aside.
Legal Topics
Regularisation of Ad Hoc Appointees, Selection Grade Pay, Estoppel Against Law, Role and Responsibility of Advocates, Review Under Code of Civil Procedure
Service Law Regularisation of Ad Hoc Appointees Selection Grade Pay Estoppel Against Law Role and Responsibility of Advocates Review Under Code of Civil Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

State of Rajasthan

Appellant

Surendra Mohnot

Respondent

Respondent Nos. 1 to 7 (Lower Division Clerks, ad hoc appointees)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Orders, Final Supreme Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether employees appointed on ad hoc basis are entitled to computation of selection grades from initial appointment or only from regularization date
  2. 2 Applicability of prior judgment (Chandra Shekhar's case vs Jagdish Narain Chaturvedi's case) to selection grade entitlement
  3. 3 Whether consent in court based on wrong precedent binds parties and prevents raising correct legal position

Ratio Decidendi

Employees prior to regularization are not members of service or part of the cadre; selection grade entitlement arises only from date of regularization. Any grant based on misconstrued legal position or concession referencing an unrelated precedent does not override correct law. The writ petition claiming selection grade from initial appointment was not justified and must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; writ petition dismissed; prior orders set aside.

Orders

  • Orders of writ court and intra-court appeal set aside.
  • Writ petition stands dismissed.