S. KANDASWAMY CHETTIAR versus STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.
Section 29 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, conferring power to grant exemptions, does not suffer from excessive delegation and is not violative of Article 14 as there is sufficient legislative guidance; the classification of buildings owned by Hindu, Christian, and Muslim religious public...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Petitioner: S. Kandaswamy Chettiar; Respondent: State of Tamil Nadu; Respondent: another respondent (Trusts and landlords)
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 1984
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petitions and Civil Appeals by Special Leave / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- writ petitions and civil appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Excessive Delegation, Article 14 of the Constitution, Classification, Rent Control Exemptions
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S. Kandaswamy Chettiar
Petitioner
State of Tamil Nadu
Respondent
another respondent (Trusts and landlords)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petitions and Civil Appeals by Special Leave / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Section 29 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 suffers from excessive delegation and is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution
- 2 Whether the Notification granting total exemption to buildings owned by Hindu, Christian, and Muslim religious public trusts and public charitable trusts violates Article 14 by being discriminatory
- 3 Whether total exemption is excessive, unwarranted, and unsupportable where partial exemption would have sufficed
Ratio Decidendi
Section 29 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, conferring power to grant exemptions, does not suffer from excessive delegation and is not violative of Article 14 as there is sufficient legislative guidance; the classification of buildings owned by Hindu, Christian, and Muslim religious public trusts and public charitable trusts for exemption is intelligible and has a rational nexus with the object of the Act; total exemption is justified and not excessive in the circumstances.
Court Disposition
writ petitions and civil appeals dismissed
Orders
- All interim orders, if any, are vacated.
- There will be no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment