DARPAN KUMAR SHARMA @ DHARBAN KUMAR SHARMA versus STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.

DARPAN KUMAR SHARMA @ DHARBAN KUMAR SHARMA versus STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.

Preventive detention under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1982 is not justified on a solitary instance of robbery; there was no material to show such act disturbed public order as required by the statute.

Parties
Petitioner: D.K. Sharma; Respondent: State of Tamil Nadu
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
20 January 2003
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (criminal) No. 87/2002 (under Article 32 of the Constitution of India) / Final Disposition
Outcome
Petition allowed; prevention detention order quashed.
Legal Topics
Preventive Detention, Right to Life and Liberty, Public Order, Robbery, Detention Under Special Statutes

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

D.K. Sharma

Petitioner

State of Tamil Nadu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition (criminal) No. 87/2002 (under Article 32 of the Constitution of India) / Final Disposition

  1. 1 Whether a solitary instance of robbery justifies preventive detention under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1982 for maintenance of public order
  2. 2 Violation of Articles 21 and 22(5) of the Constitution by detention order

Ratio Decidendi

Preventive detention under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1982 is not justified on a solitary instance of robbery; there was no material to show such act disturbed public order as required by the statute.

Court Disposition

Petition allowed; prevention detention order quashed.

Orders

  • Detenu (petitioner) to be released forthwith unless required to be detained under any other law.