S. M. MAHENDRU AND COMPANY ETC. versus STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.
The exemption granted to buildings owned by co-operative societies under Notification No. II (2) H.O. 6060/76 is a legitimate exercise of power under section 29 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960. This classification is based on statutory restraints on profit and substantial differences from private landlords, and has a clear nexus with the Act's objects. Therefore, the notification is not violative of Article 14.
- Parties
- Petitioner: S. M. Mahendru and Company etc.; Respondent: State of Tamil Nadu and Anr.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 1984
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (article 32) / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Petitions dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Exemption From Rent Control, Constitutionality of Government Notifications, Article 14 – Equality Before Law, Co Operative Societies, Tamil Nadu Buildings (lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S. M. Mahendru and Company etc.
Petitioner
State of Tamil Nadu and Anr.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (article 32) / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Notification No. II (2) H.O. 6060/76 dated 21st November 1976 exempting buildings owned by co-operative societies from all provisions of Tamil Nadu Act 18 of 1960 violates Article 14 of the Constitution.
- 2 Whether there was intelligible differentia and nexus with the Act's objects in granting exemption to co-operative societies.
Ratio Decidendi
The exemption granted to buildings owned by co-operative societies under Notification No. II (2) H.O. 6060/76 is a legitimate exercise of power under section 29 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960. This classification is based on statutory restraints on profit and substantial differences from private landlords, and has a clear nexus with the Act's objects. Therefore, the notification is not violative of Article 14.
Court Disposition
Petitions dismissed
Orders
- Interim orders, if any, are vacated.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment