SANKATHA SINGH versus STATE OF U.P.
An appellate court has no power to set aside its own order dismissing a criminal appeal (in circumstances where neither appellant nor counsel appeared), and order re-hearing, because sections 369 and 424 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, prohibit alteration or review of a judgment once signed, except to correct clerical errors. The omission to write a detailed judgment may allow a superior court to set aside the order, but not the same court.
- Parties
- Appellants: Sankatha Singh and others; Respondent: State of U.P.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 25 January 1962
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal Against Dismissal of Criminal Revision From the High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appellate Procedure, Power to Review, Dismissal of Appeal for Default
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sankatha Singh and others
Appellants
State of U.P.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal Against Dismissal of Criminal Revision From the High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a criminal appellate court can order re-hearing of an appeal dismissed earlier when neither appellant nor counsel appeared?
- 2 Whether the appellate court has power to review its order after it has been signed?
- 3 Whether inherent powers can be exercised to do what the Code prohibits?
Ratio Decidendi
An appellate court has no power to set aside its own order dismissing a criminal appeal (in circumstances where neither appellant nor counsel appeared), and order re-hearing, because sections 369 and 424 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, prohibit alteration or review of a judgment once signed, except to correct clerical errors. The omission to write a detailed judgment may allow a superior court to set aside the order, but not the same court.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment