YOGENDRA MURARI versus STATE OF U.P.
The detention order was valid as delay was satisfactorily explained by circumstances of the petitioner being in custody awaiting bail, public order disturbance justified referring to all incidents, individual roles justified detention of petitioner only, no procedural lapses were found, and the Central Government duly considered the representation.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Yogendra Murari; Respondent: State of U.P.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 08 August 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (criminal) / Final Disposition by Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Detention Under National Security Act, Delay in Passing Detention Order, Discrimination in Detention, Procedural Safeguards, Bail and Preventive Detention
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yogendra Murari
Petitioner
State of U.P.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (criminal) / Final Disposition by Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the detention order under Section 3(2) National Security Act is invalid due to delay
- 2 Whether reference to earlier incidents not linked to public order vitiates the detention order
- 3 Whether detention was made solely to frustrate bail
Ratio Decidendi
The detention order was valid as delay was satisfactorily explained by circumstances of the petitioner being in custody awaiting bail, public order disturbance justified referring to all incidents, individual roles justified detention of petitioner only, no procedural lapses were found, and the Central Government duly considered the representation.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed
Orders
- Writ application dismissed; detention order upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment