M/S. SHREE SIDHBALI STEELS LTD. AND ORS. versus STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
The State Government is empowered by Sections 14 and 21 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, and Section 49 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 to withdraw or modify the rebate by issuing a fresh notification. There can be no promissory estoppel against exercise of statutory powers or against statute, particularly when withdrawal was in larger public interest. The policy decision of not granting rebate is a fiscal matter not subject to judicial review absent arbitrariness or unreasonableness; no breach of Article 14 exists.
- Parties
- Petitioner: M/S. Shree Sidhbali Steels Ltd. and others; Respondent: State of U.P. and others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 20 January 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (civil) / Supreme Court Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Rebate on Electricity Charges, Promissory Estoppel Against State, Judicial Review of Fiscal Decisions, Policy Withdrawal, Subordinate Legislation, General Clauses Act Applicability, Powers of Electricity Regulatory Commission
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M/S. Shree Sidhbali Steels Ltd. and others
Petitioner
State of U.P. and others
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) / Supreme Court Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the State Government can withdraw or reduce Hill Development Rebate granted under Section 49 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948
- 2 Applicability of doctrine of promissory estoppel against withdrawal/reduction of rebate by the State
- 3 Judicial review of State Government's fiscal/policy decisions under Article 32 of the Constitution
Ratio Decidendi
The State Government is empowered by Sections 14 and 21 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, and Section 49 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 to withdraw or modify the rebate by issuing a fresh notification. There can be no promissory estoppel against exercise of statutory powers or against statute, particularly when withdrawal was in larger public interest. The policy decision of not granting rebate is a fiscal matter not subject to judicial review absent arbitrariness or unreasonableness; no breach of Article 14 exists.
Court Disposition
Petition dismissed
Orders
- Rule discharged
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment