STATE OF U.P. & ANR. versus RAM ADHAR

STATE OF U.P. & ANR. versus RAM ADHAR

An ad hoc appointee who fails the test has no right to continue till a regular appointment; temporary employees have no right to the post.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: State of U.P. & Anr.; Respondent: Ram Adhar
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
10 April 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order of Division Bench Allahabad High Court Dated 14.8.2001
Outcome
Appeal allowed; orders of Single Judge and Division Bench of Allahabad High Court set aside; no costs.
Legal Topics
Ad Hoc Appointment, Appointment to Posts Requiring Special Skills
Service Law Ad Hoc Appointment Appointment to Posts Requiring Special Skills

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

State of U.P. & Anr.

Appellant

Ram Adhar

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order of Division Bench Allahabad High Court Dated 14.8.2001

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an ad hoc appointee who failed the qualifying test has any right to continue till a regular appointment.
  2. 2 What should be the criterion for appointment to posts requiring special skills.

Ratio Decidendi

An ad hoc appointee who fails the test has no right to continue till a regular appointment; temporary employees have no right to the post.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; orders of Single Judge and Division Bench of Allahabad High Court set aside; no costs.

Orders

  • Both orders of the Single Judge and Division Bench of Allahabad High Court set aside.
  • Appeal allowed.