P.K. DIXIT AND ORS. versus STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
Seniority of promoted officers in Higher Judicial Service prior to coming into force of 1975 rules must be determined from date of their probation/officiation and confirmation should be from the date of available vacancy, not arbitrarily fixed; all vacancies prior to rules to be filled by promotion and continuous officiation considered as period of probation, with a maximum of three years for seniority purposes.
- Parties
- Petitioner: P.K. Dixit and Ors.; Respondent: State of U.P. & Ors.; Respondent: State of U.P.; Intervenor: Intervenor
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 08 October 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition (civil) Nos. 11788–11796 of 1984 / Original Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Petitions partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Seniority Determination, Judicial Service Appointments, Confirmation and Probation, Rules on Promotion and Direct Recruitment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P.K. Dixit and Ors.
Petitioner
State of U.P. & Ors.
Respondent
State of U.P.
Respondent
Intervenor
Intervenor
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (civil) Nos. 11788–11796 of 1984 / Original Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether seniority of promoted officers should be determined from date of their continuous officiation or from an arbitrarily fixed date by High Court.
- 2 Whether officiating period should be treated as period of probation for confirming officers in Higher Judicial Service.
- 3 Principles for confirmation and seniority determination for posts abolished and filled by promotion before coming into force of U.P. Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975.
Ratio Decidendi
Seniority of promoted officers in Higher Judicial Service prior to coming into force of 1975 rules must be determined from date of their probation/officiation and confirmation should be from the date of available vacancy, not arbitrarily fixed; all vacancies prior to rules to be filled by promotion and continuous officiation considered as period of probation, with a maximum of three years for seniority purposes.
Court Disposition
Petitions partly allowed
Orders
- High Court to examine afresh posts available as of 10th May 1974 plus thirty-one posts, and fill them only by promotees.
- High Court to prepare afresh seniority list in accordance with Rules and notify it for objections.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment