STATE OF U.P. versus ALLIED CONSTRUCTIONS
The force majeure clause was not attracted as no evidence was led to show the flood was caused by unprecedented rain. The arbitrator acted within his jurisdiction, and interpretation of the contract is for the arbitrator. The award stands except for modification of the interest rate.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of U.P.; Respondent: Allied Constructions
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated 18.12.1995 of the Allahabad High Court in F.a.o. No. 715 of 1994
- Outcome
- Appeal disposed of with modification of the interest rate.
- Legal Topics
- Force Majeure Clause, Interpretation of Contract, Setting Aside Arbitral Award
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of U.P.
Appellant
Allied Constructions
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Judgment and Order Dated 18.12.1995 of the Allahabad High Court in F.a.o. No. 715 of 1994
Legal Issues
- 1 Applicability of force majeure clause in construction contract
- 2 Grounds for setting aside arbitral award under Arbitration Act, 1940
Ratio Decidendi
The force majeure clause was not attracted as no evidence was led to show the flood was caused by unprecedented rain. The arbitrator acted within his jurisdiction, and interpretation of the contract is for the arbitrator. The award stands except for modification of the interest rate.
Court Disposition
Appeal disposed of with modification of the interest rate.
Orders
- The interest chargeable from the date of filing of claim till the date of award shall be at the rate of 12 per cent in place of 18 per cent. The award and judgment under challenge stand modified to that extent.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment