STATE OF U.P. versus M/S MODI DISTILLERY ETC. ETC.
The State is not empowered to levy excise duty on raw materials or input in the process of being made into alcoholic liquor for human consumption; excise duty can only be levied on the final product which is consumable by humans as a beverage at the stage it becomes 'alcoholic liquor for human consumption'. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of U.P.; Respondent: Modi Distillery and others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Allahabad High Court Judgments/orders Dated 9th March 1979 and 11th October 1979
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed in part and dismissed in part.
- Legal Topics
- Excise Duty, State Taxing Powers, Alcoholic Liquor for Human Consumption, Rectified Spirit, Seventh Schedule Entry 51 List II, Manufacture and Regulation of Liquor
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of U.P.
Appellant
Modi Distillery and others
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Allahabad High Court Judgments/orders Dated 9th March 1979 and 11th October 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the State of U.P. is empowered to levy excise duty on raw material/input in the process of being made into alcoholic liquor for human consumption under Entry 51 of List II and Section 3(22a), 28 of U.P. Excise Act, 1910.
- 2 Whether excise duty can be levied on wastage or loss at various manufacturing/transit stages, including obscure loss (obscuration) and pipeline/transit wastage.
Ratio Decidendi
The State is not empowered to levy excise duty on raw materials or input in the process of being made into alcoholic liquor for human consumption; excise duty can only be levied on the final product which is consumable by humans as a beverage at the stage it becomes 'alcoholic liquor for human consumption'. The State cannot expand its power with reference to its regulatory powers. Excise duty on wastage of IMFL exported outside U.P. is permissible, as settled by precedent, but not on losses or wastage prior to the formation of consumable alcohol (e.g., obscuration, pipeline wastage, or pre-dilution spirit).
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed in part and dismissed in part.
Orders
- Appeals allowed only as to levy of excise duty upon wastage of IMFL exported outside the State of Uttar Pradesh; High Court’s contrary holding set aside for Group 'A'.
- For the rest (Groups B, C, D: duty demands on wastage in transit, obscuration, pipeline loss), appeals dismissed and High Court’s judgment quashing the demands is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment