STATE OF U.P. versus PARAS NATH SINGH

STATE OF U.P. versus PARAS NATH SINGH

Sanction under Section 197 CrPC was not necessary for the offences alleged; errors in charge framing and examination under Section 313 CrPC do not vitiate conviction unless actual failure of justice is shown; the High Court's refusal to grant leave based solely on sanction was erroneous.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: State of U.P.; Respondent: Paras Nath Singh
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
05 May 2009
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal to Grant Leave to Appeal by High Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Sanction for Prosecution, Scope of Official Duty, Failure of Justice, Framing of Charges, Examination Under Section 313 Cr PC
Criminal Law Sanction for Prosecution Scope of Official Duty Failure of Justice Framing of Charges Examination Under Section 313 Cr PC

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

State of U.P.

Appellant

Paras Nath Singh

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal to Grant Leave to Appeal by High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether sanction under s.197 CrPC was required for prosecution of the respondent
  2. 2 Whether errors in framing of charge and inappropriate examination of the accused under s.313 CrPC warranted acquittal

Ratio Decidendi

Sanction under Section 197 CrPC was not necessary for the offences alleged; errors in charge framing and examination under Section 313 CrPC do not vitiate conviction unless actual failure of justice is shown; the High Court's refusal to grant leave based solely on sanction was erroneous.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Impugned order of the High Court set aside
  • Leave to appeal granted