STATE OF U.P versus RAM BALAK AND ANR.

STATE OF U.P versus RAM BALAK AND ANR.

The circumstances relied upon by the prosecution do not form a complete and exclusive chain of events pointing to the guilt of the accused, and the extra-judicial confession was not duly confronted to the accused under Section 313. The High Court was correct in acquitting the accused.

Parties
Appellant: State of U.P.; Respondent: Ram Balak; Respondent: An R.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
03 October 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal Against Acquittal by High Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; acquittal confirmed.
Legal Topics
Circumstantial Evidence, Rape and Murder, Appeal Against Acquittal, Extra Judicial Confession
Criminal Law Circumstantial Evidence Rape and Murder Appeal Against Acquittal Extra Judicial Confession

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

State of U.P.

Appellant

Ram Balak

Respondent

An R.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal Against Acquittal by High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the High Court erred in acquitting the accused when the conviction was based solely on circumstantial evidence
  2. 2 Whether the circumstances proved make a complete chain pointing unerringly to the guilt of the accused
  3. 3 Whether extra-judicial confession and dog squad evidence were admissible and sufficient for conviction

Ratio Decidendi

The circumstances relied upon by the prosecution do not form a complete and exclusive chain of events pointing to the guilt of the accused, and the extra-judicial confession was not duly confronted to the accused under Section 313. The High Court was correct in acquitting the accused.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; acquittal confirmed.

Orders

  • Criminal Appeal dismissed; High Court order of acquittal maintained.