MASUD KHAN versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

MASUD KHAN versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

The petitioner failed to discharge the burden of proving he was an Indian citizen as required under s.9 of the Foreigners Act. The principle of issue-estoppel does not apply because the prior acquittal was in a criminal prosecution, but the present internment proceedings are not criminal. Accordingly, the petitioner is a foreigner and not entitled to relief.

Parties
Petitioner: Masud Khan; Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
26 September 1973
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition / Original Jurisdiction
Outcome
Petition dismissed
Legal Topics
Citizenship Determination, Burden of Proof, Foreigners Act, Issue Estoppel
Constitutional Law Immigration Law Citizenship Determination Burden of Proof Foreigners Act Issue Estoppel

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Masud Khan

Petitioner

State of Uttar Pradesh

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition / Original Jurisdiction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the petitioner is a foreigner or an Indian citizen under the Foreigners Act
  2. 2 Whether an earlier acquittal under a criminal prosecution operates as issue estoppel in subsequent internment proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The petitioner failed to discharge the burden of proving he was an Indian citizen as required under s.9 of the Foreigners Act. The principle of issue-estoppel does not apply because the prior acquittal was in a criminal prosecution, but the present internment proceedings are not criminal. Accordingly, the petitioner is a foreigner and not entitled to relief.

Court Disposition

Petition dismissed

Orders

  • Petition dismissed