LATA SINGH versus STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

LATA SINGH versus STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

The Supreme Court held that the petitioner, being a major, could marry anyone she chose and that no offence was committed by her husband or his relatives. The criminal proceedings initiated were an abuse of the process of court and administrative machinery at the instigation of her brothers. Therefore, the proceedings were quashed, and criminal proceedings were directed to be instituted against the petitioner's brothers.

Parties
Petitioner: Lata Singh; Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh; Accused: Sangita Gupta & Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
07 July 2006
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition (criminal) / Original Jurisdiction
Outcome
Writ petition allowed; criminal proceedings quashed.
Legal Topics
Inter Caste Marriage, Abuse of Process, Personal Liberty, Harassment, Article 32
Criminal Law Constitutional Law Inter Caste Marriage Abuse of Process Personal Liberty Harassment Article 32

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lata Singh

Petitioner

State of Uttar Pradesh

Respondent

Sangita Gupta & Ors.

Accused

Procedural Posture

Writ Petition (criminal) / Original Jurisdiction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the criminal proceedings against the petitioner's husband and his relatives for inter-caste marriage amount to abuse of process?
  2. 2 Whether a major is free to marry according to his/her will?
  3. 3 Whether the police authorities acted unlawfully by proceeding against the petitioner's husband and relatives instead of the petitioner's brothers?

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that the petitioner, being a major, could marry anyone she chose and that no offence was committed by her husband or his relatives. The criminal proceedings initiated were an abuse of the process of court and administrative machinery at the instigation of her brothers. Therefore, the proceedings were quashed, and criminal proceedings were directed to be instituted against the petitioner's brothers.

Court Disposition

Writ petition allowed; criminal proceedings quashed.

Orders

  • Sessions Trial No. 1201/2001 State of U.P. v. Sangita Gupta & Ors. arising out of FIR No. 336/2000 quashed.
  • Warrants against the accused are quashed.