NEW INDIA SUGAR WORKS ETC. ETC. versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.
The levy notification operates on all stocks, whether manufactured before or after its issuance; price fixation prioritizes consumer interests, and restrictions imposed are not unreasonable; no violation of Articles 14 or 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.
- Parties
- Petitioner: New India Sugar Works Etc. Etc.; Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh; Respondent: State of Madhya Pradesh; Respondent: Union of India
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 1981
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition / Final Disposition
- Outcome
- Petitions dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Retrospective Operation of Levy Orders, Price Fixation, Reasonableness of Restrictions, Levy on Manufactured Goods
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
New India Sugar Works Etc. Etc.
Petitioner
State of Uttar Pradesh
Respondent
State of Madhya Pradesh
Respondent
Union of India
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition / Final Disposition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the levy order on khandsari sugar has retrospective operation applying to existing stocks
- 2 Whether fixation of levy sugar price must cover manufacturing cost
Ratio Decidendi
The levy notification operates on all stocks, whether manufactured before or after its issuance; price fixation prioritizes consumer interests, and restrictions imposed are not unreasonable; no violation of Articles 14 or 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.
Court Disposition
Petitions dismissed
Orders
- Stay granted in all petitions to continue until sub-clauses 3 and 5 in impugned notifications are withdrawn by State Governments.
- Government to delete or withdraw sub-clauses restricting free sale of sugar and ensure proper handling of levy sugar stocks.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment