SHABNAM versus STATE OF U. P.
The extreme brutality, calculated and diabolical nature of the murders—committed by appellant Shabnam and her co-accused Saleem by drugging and then killing seven family members, including a ten-month-old infant, without provocation or remorse—outweigh mitigating circumstances. The case qualifies as 'rarest of rare', warranting death penalty as life imprisonment would be wholly inadequate.
- Parties
- Appellant Accused: Shabnam; Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Final Disposition, Post High Court Confirmation of Death Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed; death sentence confirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Death Penalty, Murder, Aggravating and Mitigating Circumstances, Circumstantial Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shabnam
Appellant Accused
State of Uttar Pradesh
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Disposition, Post High Court Confirmation of Death Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Propriety of death penalty for murder of seven family members including an infant
- 2 Appropriate sentencing in cases considered 'rarest of rare'
- 3 Consideration of aggravating versus mitigating circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
The extreme brutality, calculated and diabolical nature of the murders—committed by appellant Shabnam and her co-accused Saleem by drugging and then killing seven family members, including a ten-month-old infant, without provocation or remorse—outweigh mitigating circumstances. The case qualifies as 'rarest of rare', warranting death penalty as life imprisonment would be wholly inadequate.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed; death sentence confirmed.
Orders
- Registry directed to pay Rs.10,000 to learned amicus curiae in each case.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment