STATE OF UTTRAKHAND & ORS. versus DEEP CHANDRA TEWARI & ANR.

STATE OF UTTRAKHAND & ORS. versus DEEP CHANDRA TEWARI & ANR.

B.Ed. degree simplicitor as mentioned in the advertisement is the essential qualification; B.Ed. with Specialisation in Vocational Education does not satisfy the requirement as the specialisation is not relevant to the duties of Assistant Teacher (General) at the primary level, and Government action rejecting such candidature is justified.

Parties
Appellant: State of Uttrakhand & Ors.; Respondent: Deep Chandra Tewari & Anr.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
01 November 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Decision on Appeal Against High Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Recruitment, Qualification, Educational Requirements for Appointment as Assistant Teacher (general)
Service Law Recruitment Qualification Educational Requirements for Appointment as Assistant Teacher (general)

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

State of Uttrakhand & Ors.

Appellant

Deep Chandra Tewari & Anr.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Decision on Appeal Against High Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether B.Ed. Specialisation in Vocational Education fulfills the prescribed qualification of B.Ed. Degree for the post of Assistant Teacher (General)
  2. 2 Whether higher qualification in a different channel can substitute the prescribed qualification

Ratio Decidendi

B.Ed. degree simplicitor as mentioned in the advertisement is the essential qualification; B.Ed. with Specialisation in Vocational Education does not satisfy the requirement as the specialisation is not relevant to the duties of Assistant Teacher (General) at the primary level, and Government action rejecting such candidature is justified.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Judgment of Single Judge and Division Bench of the High Court set aside
  • No order as to costs