PANKAJ KUMAR CHAKRABARTY AND ORS. versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL
The appropriate government has a constitutional obligation to consider the representation made by the detenue under Article 22(5) irrespective of whether it was made before or after referral to the Advisory Board. Failure to do so renders the detention order invalid.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Pankaj Kumar Chakrabarty and Ors.; Respondent: State of West Bengal
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 01 May 1969
- Procedural Posture
- Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition allowed; Detention orders set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Article 22(5) of the Constitution, Preventive Detention Act 1950, Right to Representation Against Detention, Obligation of State Government
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pankaj Kumar Chakrabarty and Ors.
Petitioner
State of West Bengal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Writ Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there is a constitutional obligation on the appropriate government to consider a representation made by a detenue under Art. 22(5).
- 2 Whether it makes any difference if such representation is made after the case is referred to the Advisory Board.
Ratio Decidendi
The appropriate government has a constitutional obligation to consider the representation made by the detenue under Article 22(5) irrespective of whether it was made before or after referral to the Advisory Board. Failure to do so renders the detention order invalid.
Court Disposition
Petition allowed; Detention orders set aside.
Orders
- The orders of detention against petitioners 15 and 36 are set aside.
- Petitioners are to be set at liberty forthwith.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment