D.K. BASU versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL

D.K. BASU versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Custodial violence, including torture and deaths in police custody, is an egregious violation of Articles 21 and 22 of the Constitution, striking at the heart of the rule of law. The Supreme Court issued mandatory guidelines for arrest and detention to safeguard constitutional rights, holding that victims (or their families) are entitled to compensation under public law in addition to remedies under private law and criminal law. The requirements issued apply equally to all governmental agencies, not just the police, and must be publicized and strictly complied with; failure attracts departmental proceedings and contempt of court.

Parties
Petitioner: D.K. Basu; Respondent: State of West Bengal
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
18 December 1996
Procedural Posture
Public Interest Petition / Final Judgment
Outcome
Petition disposed of; guidelines issued.
Legal Topics
Custodial Violence, Torture and Deaths in Police Custody, Compensation for Violation of Fundamental Rights, Public Law Remedy for Rights Infringement, Police Powers and Accountability
Constitutional Law Criminal Law Human Rights Custodial Violence Torture and Deaths in Police Custody Compensation for Violation of Fundamental Rights Public Law Remedy for Rights Infringement Police Powers and Accountability

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

D.K. Basu

Petitioner

State of West Bengal

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Public Interest Petition / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether custodial violence and deaths in police custody/lock-up infringe fundamental rights under Articles 21 and 22 of the Constitution.
  2. 2 Whether the Supreme Court can formulate guidelines and award compensation to victims or their families for atrocities and deaths caused in police custody.
  3. 3 Whether such remedies are available in addition to private law claims for tortious acts and criminal proceedings against offenders.

Ratio Decidendi

Custodial violence, including torture and deaths in police custody, is an egregious violation of Articles 21 and 22 of the Constitution, striking at the heart of the rule of law. The Supreme Court issued mandatory guidelines for arrest and detention to safeguard constitutional rights, holding that victims (or their families) are entitled to compensation under public law in addition to remedies under private law and criminal law. The requirements issued apply equally to all governmental agencies, not just the police, and must be publicized and strictly complied with; failure attracts departmental proceedings and contempt of court.

Court Disposition

Petition disposed of; guidelines issued.

Orders

  • Mandatory requirements/guidelines for arrest and detention by police and other agencies issued and directed to be followed until statutory provisions are made.
  • Non-compliance with requirements will result in departmental action and contempt of court proceedings; jurisdiction lies with the relevant High Court.