STATE OF WEST BENGAL versus S. N. BASAK
The High Court was in error in quashing the police investigation as the powers of investigation into cognizable offences under ss. 154 and 156 of the Criminal Procedure Code are statutory and cannot be interfered with under s. 439 or the inherent powers under s. 561A.
- Parties
- Appellant: State of West Bengal; Respondent: S. N. Basak
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 1962
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Calcutta High Court Judgment and Order Dated September 6, 1960 in Criminal Revision No. 647 of 1960, by Certificate Under Art.134(1)(c) of the Constitution
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Police Investigation, Quashing of Proceedings, Powers of High Court Under Criminal Procedure Code, Inherent Powers of Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
State of West Bengal
Appellant
S. N. Basak
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Calcutta High Court Judgment and Order Dated September 6, 1960 in Criminal Revision No. 647 of 1960, by Certificate Under Art.134(1)(c) of the Constitution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court could quash a police investigation into alleged offences under ss. 420, 120B read with s. 420, Indian Penal Code, by exercising powers under ss. 439 and 561A Criminal Procedure Code.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court was in error in quashing the police investigation as the powers of investigation into cognizable offences under ss. 154 and 156 of the Criminal Procedure Code are statutory and cannot be interfered with under s. 439 or the inherent powers under s. 561A.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of the High Court set aside
- Police investigation to proceed in accordance with law
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment