BANSIDHAR AND OTHERS versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND OTHERS
The right of the State to take over excess land and the liability of the land-owner to surrender surplus land as of the notified date under the 1955 Act were rights 'accrued' and liabilities 'incurred', preserved by s.6 of the Rajasthan General Clauses Act, 1955. The scheme of the 1973 Act did not manifest an intention contrary to the saving of the repealed provisions for pending cases. Therefore, proceedings initiated and pending under the repealed law could be continued and concluded under its provisions.
- Parties
- Appellants: Bansidhar and others; Respondents: State of Rajasthan and others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 29 March 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal and Writ Petition / Appeal From High Court Judgment and Writ Petition Filed Directly in Supreme Court
- Outcome
- appeals and petitions dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Repeal and Saving, Land Ceiling, Rights Accrued Under Repealed Statutes, Rajasthan Tenancy Act, Rajasthan Imposition of Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, General Clauses Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bansidhar and others
Appellants
State of Rajasthan and others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal and Writ Petition / Appeal From High Court Judgment and Writ Petition Filed Directly in Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proceedings for determination of ceiling area under the repealed Chapter III-B of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 could be initiated and continued after the coming into force of the Rajasthan Imposition of Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1973.
- 2 Whether rights accrued and liabilities incurred under the old law are affected by the repeal and whether the new law has an overriding effect.
Ratio Decidendi
The right of the State to take over excess land and the liability of the land-owner to surrender surplus land as of the notified date under the 1955 Act were rights 'accrued' and liabilities 'incurred', preserved by s.6 of the Rajasthan General Clauses Act, 1955. The scheme of the 1973 Act did not manifest an intention contrary to the saving of the repealed provisions for pending cases. Therefore, proceedings initiated and pending under the repealed law could be continued and concluded under its provisions.
Court Disposition
appeals and petitions dismissed
Orders
- Appellants' and petitioners' claim dismissed; proceedings for ceiling determination under repealed Chapter III-B could continue.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment