SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (P), UHBVNL versus DHARAM PAL
Tampering with an electricity meter does not fall within the scope of Section 26(6) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910; consequently, no reference to the Electrical Inspector is required in such cases, and the orders by the consumer forums directing such reference are incorrect and quashed.
- Parties
- Appellant: SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (P), UHBVNL; Respondent: Dharampal
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Appeal Before Supreme Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Meter Tampering, Reference to Electrical Inspector, Correctness of Meter, Natural Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (P), UHBVNL
Appellant
Dharampal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appeal Before Supreme Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a case of tampering with an electricity meter is covered under Section 26(6) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910
- 2 Whether reference to Electrical Inspector is required in case of alleged meter tampering
Ratio Decidendi
Tampering with an electricity meter does not fall within the scope of Section 26(6) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910; consequently, no reference to the Electrical Inspector is required in such cases, and the orders by the consumer forums directing such reference are incorrect and quashed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Orders passed by District Forum, State Commission and National Commission are quashed
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment