SUBHASH CHAND JAIN versus 1ST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE SAHARANPUR AND OTHERS

As the entire amount due as arrears of rent had not been deposited within the prescribed time, the tenant is not entitled to relief from eviction under section 20(4) of the Act.

Parties: Appellant: Subhash Chand Jain; Respondents: 1st Additional District & Sessions Judge, Saharanpur and Others
Jurisdiction: India
Judgment Date: 24 February 1989
Procedural Posture: Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment
Outcome: Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics: Eviction, Arrears of Rent, Relief Under U.p. Urban Buildings Act

Tenancy Law Eviction Arrears of Rent Relief Under U.p. Urban Buildings Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Subhash Chand Jain

Appellant

1st Additional District & Sessions Judge, Saharanpur and Others

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the tenant is entitled to relief from eviction under section 20(4) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 upon deposit of arrears of rent on the first date of hearing

Ratio Decidendi

As the entire amount due as arrears of rent had not been deposited within the prescribed time, the tenant is not entitled to relief from eviction under section 20(4) of the Act.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

No order as to costs