SUBHASH CHANDER BANSAL versus GIAN CHAND AND ORS

SUBHASH CHANDER BANSAL versus GIAN CHAND AND ORS

The conviction under Section 325 read with Section 34 IPC and sentence already undergone, along with a fine of Rs.50,000, was justified given the lapse of time, compensation paid, and discretion of the courts.

Parties
Appellant: Subhash Chander Bansal; Respondent: Gian Chand; Respondent: Krishan Kumar; Respondent: Lachhman Dass; Respondent: Bhagwan Dass; Respondent: Suresh Kumar
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
25 January 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Grievous Hurt, Sentencing, Acquittal, Compensation
Criminal Law Grievous Hurt Sentencing Acquittal Compensation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Subhash Chander Bansal

Appellant

Gian Chand

Respondent

Krishan Kumar

Respondent

Lachhman Dass

Respondent

Bhagwan Dass

Respondent

Suresh Kumar

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against High Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether High Court's conviction under s.325/34 IPC and imposition of sentence already undergone with Rs.50,000 fine was justified

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction under Section 325 read with Section 34 IPC and sentence already undergone, along with a fine of Rs.50,000, was justified given the lapse of time, compensation paid, and discretion of the courts.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Conviction of four accused under s.325/34 IPC upheld
  • Sentence already undergone accepted