SUBODH GOPAL BOSE versus AJIT KUMAR HALDAR AND OTHERS
Section 7(1)(a) of the Bengal Land Revenue Sales (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1950 applies to pending suits or appeals; since the civil appeal was pending when the Amending Act commenced, and the relevant tenure existed at the relevant date, the suit abated under section 7(1)(a); delivery of possession during pendency of appeal does not prevent abatement, and it is not necessary to consider its effect.
- Parties
- Appellant: Subodh Gopal Bose; Respondents: Ajit Kumar Haldar and others
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 07 May 1963
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Calcutta High Court Judgment and Decree Dated June 16, 1958 in Appeal From Original Decree No. 144 of 1948
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Revenue Sale, Annulment of Encumbrance, Retrospective Operation of Statutes, Abatement of Suit, Effect of Pending Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Subodh Gopal Bose
Appellant
Ajit Kumar Haldar and others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Calcutta High Court Judgment and Decree Dated June 16, 1958 in Appeal From Original Decree No. 144 of 1948
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Bengal Land Revenue Sales (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1950 applies retrospectively to pending litigation concerning annulment of tenures under section 37 of the Bengal Land Revenue Sales Act, 1859.
- 2 Whether delivery of possession prior to the Amending Act insulated the plaintiff's decree from the Act's provisions.
- 3 Whether the suit abated under section 7 of the Amending Act.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 7(1)(a) of the Bengal Land Revenue Sales (West Bengal Amendment) Act, 1950 applies to pending suits or appeals; since the civil appeal was pending when the Amending Act commenced, and the relevant tenure existed at the relevant date, the suit abated under section 7(1)(a); delivery of possession during pendency of appeal does not prevent abatement, and it is not necessary to consider its effect.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; suit abated under the Amending Act; no order as to costs in Supreme Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment