SUDARSHA AVASTHI versus SHIV PAL SINGH

SUDARSHA AVASTHI versus SHIV PAL SINGH

Election petition lacked material facts and sufficient particulars of alleged corrupt practices; allegations were vague and not credible; therefore, petition not maintainable and rightly dismissed.

Parties
Appellant: Sudarsha Avasthi; Respondent: Shiv Pal Singh
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
16 May 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Final Judgment and Order of Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench in Election Petition No. 3 of 2002
Outcome
Appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
Corrupt Practices, Bribery, Maintainability of Election Petition, Material Facts in Election Petition
Election Law Corrupt Practices Bribery Maintainability of Election Petition Material Facts in Election Petition

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sudarsha Avasthi

Appellant

Shiv Pal Singh

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Final Judgment and Order of Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench in Election Petition No. 3 of 2002

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the election petition disclosed cause of action and material facts as required by Sections 82 & 83 and 123 of the Representation of People Act, 1951
  2. 2 Whether allegations of corrupt practices were sufficiently particularized

Ratio Decidendi

Election petition lacked material facts and sufficient particulars of alleged corrupt practices; allegations were vague and not credible; therefore, petition not maintainable and rightly dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeals dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs
  • Election petition remains dismissed; no restoration as present legislative council term expired