SUDHIR KUMAR MUKHERJEE AND SHAM LAL SHAW versus STATE OF WEST BENGAL
The acts of the appellants went beyond preparation and constituted an attempt to commit cheating under section 511 read with section 420 IPC, as the chalan indicating the receipt of goods was prepared, initialled, and the process to obtain wrongful gain was underway.
- Parties
- Appellant: Sudhir Kumar Mukherjee; Appellant: Sham Lal Shaw; Respondent: State of West Bengal
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 1973
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeals / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment Dated July 15, 1969 of the Calcutta High Court in Criminal Appeals Nos. 423 and 390 of 1960
- Outcome
- Appeal disposed of; conviction under s. 511 read with s. 420 IPC upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Attempt to Commit Offence, Cheating, Distinction Between Preparation and Attempt
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sudhir Kumar Mukherjee
Appellant
Sham Lal Shaw
Appellant
State of West Bengal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeals / Appeal by Special Leave From Judgment Dated July 15, 1969 of the Calcutta High Court in Criminal Appeals Nos. 423 and 390 of 1960
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the acts of the appellants constituted only preparation or amounted to attempt to commit cheating under s. 511 read with s. 420 of the Indian Penal Code
Ratio Decidendi
The acts of the appellants went beyond preparation and constituted an attempt to commit cheating under section 511 read with section 420 IPC, as the chalan indicating the receipt of goods was prepared, initialled, and the process to obtain wrongful gain was underway.
Court Disposition
Appeal disposed of; conviction under s. 511 read with s. 420 IPC upheld.
Orders
- Appellants have already suffered the sentence imposed by the Presidency Magistrate; no further orders are necessary.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment