SUKHBANS SINGH versus STATE OF PUNJAB
The reversion of the appellant was by way of punishment for misconduct, without complying with Article 311(2) of the Constitution. The government’s omission to give reasons did not make the action any less a punishment, and therefore the reversion was illegal.
- Parties
- Appellant: Sukhbans Singh; Respondent: State of Punjab
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 06 April 1962
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Punjab High Court (division Bench) Judgment Under Certificate Under Art. 133(1)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Reversion of Probationer, Public Employment, Punishment for Misconduct, Compliance With Article 311(2)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sukhbans Singh
Appellant
State of Punjab
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Punjab High Court (division Bench) Judgment Under Certificate Under Art. 133(1)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether reversion of probationer was by way of punishment
- 2 Whether requirements of Article 311(2) of the Constitution were violated
- 3 Whether a probationer automatically acquires permanent status after completion of probation
Ratio Decidendi
The reversion of the appellant was by way of punishment for misconduct, without complying with Article 311(2) of the Constitution. The government’s omission to give reasons did not make the action any less a punishment, and therefore the reversion was illegal.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order quashing reversion of appellant dated May 28, 1952
- Costs here and in the High Court to be paid by the Government
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment