SUKHDEV SINGH versus STATE OF HARYANA
Non-compliance with mandatory provisions of Section 42 NDPS Act as they existed at the time of offence (pre-amended s.42(2)) is incurable; accused must be acquitted.
- Parties
- Appellant: Sukhdev Singh; Respondent: State of Haryana
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Punjab & Haryana High Court Judgment Dated 27.03.2008
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction under Section 15 NDPS Act set aside; accused acquitted.
- Legal Topics
- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, Compliance With Section 42(2), Reporting of Information to Superior Officer, Retrospective Application of Amendments, Interpretation of Criminal Statutes, Mandatory Procedural Safeguards
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sukhdev Singh
Appellant
State of Haryana
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Supreme Court Appeal From Punjab & Haryana High Court Judgment Dated 27.03.2008
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether total non-compliance with Section 42(2) NDPS Act mandates acquittal
- 2 Applicability of amended Section 42(2) to offences committed before amendment
- 3 Whether the Investigating Officer complied with mandatory procedural requirements under NDPS Act
Ratio Decidendi
Non-compliance with mandatory provisions of Section 42 NDPS Act as they existed at the time of offence (pre-amended s.42(2)) is incurable; accused must be acquitted.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction under Section 15 NDPS Act set aside; accused acquitted.
Orders
- Judgment of High Court and Trial Court set aside.
- Accused acquitted under Section 15 NDPS Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment