SULOCHANA CHANDRAKANT GALANDE versus PUNE MUNICIPAL TRANSPORT AND ORS.

SULOCHANA CHANDRAKANT GALANDE versus PUNE MUNICIPAL TRANSPORT AND ORS.

Revision under Section 34, filed decades after possession taken, not maintainable; once land vests in State, owner loses right to restoration or to challenge user; Repeal Act does not confer any benefit where possession already taken; Atia Mohammadi Begum overruled by N. Audikesava Reddy.

Parties
Appellant: Sulochana Chandrakant Galande; Respondents: Pune Municipal Transport and Ors.
Jurisdiction
India
Judgment Date
03 August 2010
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Urban Land Ceiling, Acquisition, Limitation, Repeal of Statute

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 41 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sulochana Chandrakant Galande

Appellant

Pune Municipal Transport and Ors.

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision

  1. 1 Whether land acquired under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, not within urban area on commencement date, could be so acquired
  2. 2 Whether revision under Section 34 was maintainable after long delay
  3. 3 Effect of Repeal Act, 1999 on proceedings when possession was already taken by State

Ratio Decidendi

Revision under Section 34, filed decades after possession taken, not maintainable; once land vests in State, owner loses right to restoration or to challenge user; Repeal Act does not confer any benefit where possession already taken; Atia Mohammadi Begum overruled by N. Audikesava Reddy.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No relief to appellant; land remains vested in State; appellant not entitled to restoration or compensation beyond statutory provisions.