SULOCHANA CHANDRAKANT GALANDE versus PUNE MUNICIPAL TRANSPORT AND ORS.
Revision under Section 34, filed decades after possession taken, not maintainable; once land vests in State, owner loses right to restoration or to challenge user; Repeal Act does not confer any benefit where possession already taken; Atia Mohammadi Begum overruled by N. Audikesava Reddy.
- Parties
- Appellant: Sulochana Chandrakant Galande; Respondents: Pune Municipal Transport and Ors.
- Jurisdiction
- India
- Judgment Date
- 03 August 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Urban Land Ceiling, Acquisition, Limitation, Repeal of Statute
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sulochana Chandrakant Galande
Appellant
Pune Municipal Transport and Ors.
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether land acquired under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, not within urban area on commencement date, could be so acquired
- 2 Whether revision under Section 34 was maintainable after long delay
- 3 Effect of Repeal Act, 1999 on proceedings when possession was already taken by State
Ratio Decidendi
Revision under Section 34, filed decades after possession taken, not maintainable; once land vests in State, owner loses right to restoration or to challenge user; Repeal Act does not confer any benefit where possession already taken; Atia Mohammadi Begum overruled by N. Audikesava Reddy.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No relief to appellant; land remains vested in State; appellant not entitled to restoration or compensation beyond statutory provisions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment